EVOLUTION-MANAGER
Edit File: dontCheck.html
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>R: Identity Function to Suppress Checking</title> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="R.css" /> </head><body> <table width="100%" summary="page for dontCheck {base}"><tr><td>dontCheck {base}</td><td style="text-align: right;">R Documentation</td></tr></table> <h2>Identity Function to Suppress Checking</h2> <h3>Description</h3> <p>The <code>dontCheck</code> function is the same as <code><a href="identity.html">identity</a></code>, but is interpreted by <code>R CMD check</code> code analysis as a directive to suppress checking of <code>x</code>. Currently this is only used by <code><a href="../../tools/html/checkFF.html">checkFF</a>(registration = TRUE)</code> when checking the <code>.NAME</code> argument of foreign function calls. </p> <h3>Usage</h3> <pre> dontCheck(x) </pre> <h3>Arguments</h3> <table summary="R argblock"> <tr valign="top"><td><code>x</code></td> <td> <p>an <span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier; color: #666666;"><b>R</b></span> object.</p> </td></tr> </table> <h3>See Also</h3> <p><code>suppressForeignCheck</code> which explains why that and <code>dontCheck</code> are undesirable and should be avoided if at all possible. </p> <hr /><div style="text-align: center;">[Package <em>base</em> version 3.6.0 <a href="00Index.html">Index</a>]</div> </body></html>